![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
French court backs Baroque music editor
In the case of Lionel Sawkins v. Harmonia
Mundi, Cine Mag Bodard and SFP Productions, there are some
striking similarities with the case against Hyperion – in
one work on the French recording, Lalande’s Dies irae, Sawkins
had composed three missing orchestral parts (out of five) (a
similar task to that for an orchestral suite on the Hyperion
CD), and for the other grand motet (Lalande’s Miserere
mei) he assembled a score from
multiple sources, making many corrections and additions (again
as he did for the grands motets of Lalande recorded for Hyperion). The Tribunal
held that Harmonia Mundi had, over several years, infringed Dr.
Sawkins’s copyright in failing to seek his agreement to
exploit the recording they had made in 1990. The Tribunal also
held that Cinemag Bodard and the Société
française de Production (SFP), the coproducers of the
film, L’Allée du Roi, which has been shown several times on France2
tv and on other tv networks in France and abroad and also
issued on videocassette and DVD had also infringed
Sawkins’s rights in using in the soundtrack of the film
extracts from the Lalande works which he had edited for the
Harmonia Mundi recording, without his permission.
The Tribunal held that ‘the
intellectual work carried out by Monsieur Sawkins had consisted
of realisation, on the basis of the available sources,
themselves incomplete, of scores which made possible the
revival of works by Lalande, employing his personal skills and
technical competence to produce a work of real creation’.
In coming to their decision, the court considered the opinions
of three expert witness, detailed lists of the work done to
produce the editions, and copies of all the source materials as
well as the editions themselves. The barristers who appeared
for Dr. Sawkins (Alexandra Néri and Sébastien
Proust of the Cabinet Herbert Smith), in explaining the French
Intellectual Property Code, said that ‘what counts (in
deciding copyright) is the personal character of such
modifications, corrections and additions made by the restorer,
modest as they may be in quantitative or artistic terms. The
decisions of the Tribunal conforms eaactly to these
principles.’
The judgment underlines the necessity for
film companies to obtain the permission of copyright holders
before using recordings made from their editions in the
soundtrack of a film. In France, tv networks have a general
agreement with the French rights organisation SACEM (not including
videocassettes), but neither SACEM nor MCPS in the UK have the
right to authorise the use of a UK registered work in a film
without the copyright holder’s permission.
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
© Copyright 2009 Lionel Sawkins
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |